James Wade savaged for comment he made before UK Open final defeat to Luke Littler see more 👇 👇 

James Wade savaged for comment he made before UK Open final defeat to Luke Littler see more 👇 👇

 



The recent UK Open darts tournament concluded with a resounding victory for Luke Littler, who decisively defeated James Wade in the final. However, the aftermath of the match has been dominated by discussions surrounding comments made by Wade prior to the showdown, igniting a wave of critical reactions.

The tournament, known for its unpredictable format, saw both players navigate a challenging path to the final. Wade, in particular, had demonstrated a resurgence of form, including a notable victory over world number one Luke Humphries. His performances leading up to the final had generated considerable anticipation, and his pre-match statements further heightened the tension.

Before the final match, Wade gave his thoughts on the current state of darts, and the up and coming players. He made comments that were taken as a slight to the younger generation of players. He made comments that were interpreted by many as being arrogant.

“It’s all about timing. As soon as young darts players realise that it’s not about big 100 averages, it’s about timing and the right things at the right time… unfortunately they’re going to learn off me. And that’s going to be more often.”1

That statement, in particular, was the one that sparked so much conversation.

The final itself, however, told a different story. Littler delivered a dominant performance, leaving Wade struggling to find his rhythm. The match concluded with a decisive 11-2 victory for Littler, showcasing his exceptional talent and composure.

Following the match, Wade offered his perspective, acknowledging Littler’s superiority. “I played well in the semis, but in the final Luke just blew me away,” Wade admitted. “I’m the senior dart player, but he absolutely smashed me to bits! What can you do against that? He was the far superior player. Fair play to Luke. At the moment, he is comfortably the best or second best dart player in the world.”2

Despite this post-match acknowledgement, the pre-match comments had already ignited a significant reaction. Critics and fans alike took to social media and various platforms to express their disapproval, with many accusing Wade of underestimating Littler and displaying a lack of respect.

The irony of the situation was not lost on observers. Wade’s pre-match emphasis on “timing” and experience seemed to clash sharply with his own performance in the final, where he struggled to maintain consistency. The contrast between his words and his subsequent performance fueled the criticism.

Adding to the drama, reports indicated that Wade appeared to suffer a hand injury during the match, further compounding his difficulties. This element introduced a layer of complexity to the narrative, with some observers expressing sympathy for Wade’s challenges.

However, the prevailing sentiment remained focused on the pre-match comments and their perceived arrogance. The incident has sparked a broader discussion about the dynamics between experienced players and the new generation of talent emerging in the world of darts.

Littler, meanwhile, has continued to impress with his composure and skill. His victory at the UK Open further solidifies his position as a rising star in the sport. “This is a tournament I really wanted to win,” Littler said. “It’s my third time at the UK Open. I came here as a 16-year-old a couple of years ago, I made the quarter-finals last year, and now I’ve gone three better this year to win it! I had a job to do tonight. I just wanted to pick up the trophy, and it’s one that I can tick off the list now!”3

The contrast between Wade’s experience and Littler’s youthful exuberance has become a central theme of the tournament’s aftermath. The incident serves as a reminder of the unpredictable nature of sports, where pre-match predictions can be quickly overturned by the realities of competition. And that also that in modern sports, anything that is said before a competition, can and will be scrutinized by the public.